Consulta OnLine (periodico online) ISSN 1971-9892
2017/I
gennaio-aprile
Parte Prima
ILARIA RIVERA
(24.04.17)
Abstract
The article deals with the
events that led to the referendum of 23 June 2016 through which the British
people decided to leave the European Union and its implications on the more
general context of the European Union.
OTTO PFERSMANN
«Marine Le Pen programme le coup d'Etat»
(22.04.17)
Abstract
The article addresses the
risks of an election of Marine Le Pen to the presidency of the Republic in
France: risks for the democracy, also due to the impossibility of keeping
promises within the constitutional legality.
LUCA GRIMALDI
(10.04.17)
Abstract
The decision of the
Constitutional Court commented in this article shows a substantive continuity
with a previous jurisprudential stance which has some criticalities on the
delimitation of state and regional competences in the construction sector. A
perspective more open to requests for autonomy is therefore proposed, albeit
with the constraint that this is reasonably consistent with the system and
general purposes established by state legislation.
ALFONSO CELOTTO
La Cassazione inopinatamente non
applica il taglia-leggi (in margine a sent. n. 7976 del 2016)
(03.04.17)
Abstract
The Supreme Court
unexpectedly does not apply the cut-laws (in the margin of sent. No. 7976 of
2016)
This paper examines the
exercise of the legislative power of the Regions in "urban
planning". It focuses as specially on interference between state and
regional law concerning the «free building» interventions as interpreted by the
Constitutional Court in the decision no. 231/16.
LARA TRUCCO
"Sentenza Italicum": la
Consulta tra detto, non considerato e lasciato intendere
(31.03.17)
Abstract
«Italicum judgment»: the
Constitutional Court between what has been
said, what has not been considered and what has been left implicit
The author focuses on the Constitutional Court's Dec.
No. 35 of 2017, which declared the unconstitutionality of some
aspect of the electoral system of the Chamber of Deputies introduced by Law No.
52/2015 (s.c. «Italicum»). It is demonstrated that the judgment constitutes a
further and probably irreversible step in the path that led the Constitutional Court, under certain
conditions, to become an electoral
judge.
ANTONIO RUGGERI CARMELA
SALAZAR
(27.03.17)
Abstract
The study analyzes the legal issues arising from surrogate motherhood
and the now predominant role assumed by the judiciary in a matter where
targeted political choices would instead be necessary.
GIOVANNI PICCIRILLI
(16.03.17)
Abstract
The only possibility to
avoid immediate recourse to counter-limits: a preliminary ruling that resembles
a warning (known to the Court of Constitutional Court, Order No. 24/2017)
The
order no. 24/2017 represents a fundamental step in the so called «Taricco saga», as it formally opens the exchange between
the Italian Constitutional Court and the Court of Justice of the EU. Apart from
the dialoguing nature of the instrument, its contents and even its tone are
very confrontational, up to constitute a sort of ultimatum against the order of
disapplication issued with the previous decision of the CJEU. For the very
first time the ICC made use of the constitutional identity of the Member States
as a limit to EU law, interpreting it in continuity with the doctrine of counterlimits.
ERIK FURNO
(16.03.17)
Abstract
Budgetary balance and
social rights: the redefinition of borders in the recent constitutional
jurisprudence on the subject of the right to education of the disabled
Balance budget and social
rights: the redefinition of the budgetary constraints for the right to
education of disabled people in the recent constitutional jurisprudence. The
author is in favor of prevalence of social right on budget balance, following
the sentence n. 275/2016
of the Constitutional Court, that cancels the regional law of Abruzzo n.
15/2004 stating that the regional contribution for transportation of disabled
students is limited by the financial availability.
FRANCESCA BAILO
(09.03.17)
Abstract
The principle of legality
in criminal matters such as counter-limits to the Euro-EU system: an
interlocutory decision (but not too much!) Of the Constitutional Court after
the Taricco case
This paper proposes to highlight
how, with the ord. n. 24 of 2017,
the Constitutional Court has, with timely and unprecedented concreteness,
raised the boundaries to the primacy of EU law in favor of the sovereignty of
the States, "exposing" (but not yet "opposing") the c.d. theory of counterlimits,
providing the ECJ with hints to reach more mild advice on the principles
enshrined in the judgment Taricco I, recalling it,
in particular, to review its position on the substantial nature of the
prescription attributed to the institution in the national system which, as
such, is subject to the principle of legality pursuant to art. 25 Cost.
MARTA CAREDDA
Ragionevoli disuguaglianze e riserva
di legge
(09.03.17)
Abstract
This paper comments decision no. 20 of 2020
of the Constitutional Court and highlights the peculiarities of the issue that
led the Court to decide on the merits and avoid an inadmissibility decision
ANTONIO RUGGERI
(27.01.17)
Abstract
The subject-matter of this
article is the order No. 24/2017
of the Italian Constitutional Court: a preliminary reference to the European
Court of Justice on the interpretation of the so called Taricco
rule. The Author considers this order as an ultimatum to the European Court of
Justice, although given in a cooperative way: the Italian Constitutional Court
simply explained the Italian counter-limits doctrine, but did not resort to it.
STEFANIA CANTISANI
(31.01.17)
Abstract
The article focuses on Judgment No. 63/2016
of the Italian Constitutional Court which declared void some articles of a law
enacted by the Lombardia Region. These articles did
not comply with the principles of religious freedom and equality, due to the
strict requirements for some religion confessions when establishing their
places of worship. The Author supports the decision of the Italian Constitutional
Court but also underlines some of its weaknesses.
ALBERTO RANDAZZO
(24.01.17)
Abstract
This paper focuses on the
representative democracy and direct democracy but, in particular, the core is
the crisis of the political representation compared to the territorial
representation. It also analyses the regional representative considering an "internal side" that is the role of the
State-Regions Conference and arrangements and an "external side" that is the role of the
Committee of the Regions. Then, some suggestions are given in order to make the
regional representative substantial and effective (A.R.)
GIACOMO D'AMICO
(11.01.17)
Abstract
The article carries out an
analysis in view of the decision of the Italian Constitutional Court on the
referendum concerning the Italian so called Job Act. In the light of some
precedents, the Author argues that the Constitutional Court should reject the
request for the referendum, as it would produce new legislation extraneous to
its legal context.
LINDA ARDIZZONE E ROBERTO DI
MARIA
(11.01.17)
Abstract
The order 149 of 2016 of
the Constitutional Court: an occasion (missed) to rethink the procedural
structure - and then the function - of the judgment for conflict of
attributions between State Powers?
"Cirinnà-bis"
in materia di unioni civili. Da tale episodio, la stura per riflettere sui
"confini" del predetto sindacato - come delineati, soprattutto, dalla
giurisprudenza - e sulla attualità dell'indirizzo ermeneutico - pressoché
monoliticamente seguito dal Giudice costituzionale - di escludere la
legittimazione del singolo parlamentare. Con particolare riferimento al
Parlamento ed ai suoi membri, infatti, c'è da chiedersi se l'ipotesi di una
maggiore "apertura" del conflitto possa effettivamente corrispondere
all'esigenza di implementare il principio di leale cooperazione tra Poteri; e
se la legittimazione attiva del singolo parlamentare possa indurre la
enucleazione di "buone prassi" salvaguardando - da un lato - i
principi costituzionali che filtrano la natura "democratica"
dell'ordinamento repubblicano, attraverso i meccanismi tipici della c.d.
"rappresentanza indiretta", e - d'altro lato - il principio (supremo)
di autonomia del Parlamento compendiato negli interna corporis acta;
nonché - vieppiù - se "aprire le porte" del Parlamento ad un giudice
"esterno", foss'anche quello costituzionale, possa costituire
strumento per riguadagnare, al Parlamento, la "centralità"
istituzionale da tempo smarrita ed, indi, rivitalizzarne il ruolo di
"perno" del dibattito politico nazionale.
EMMA A. IMPARATO
La Consulta alla prova dell'Italicum:
la via dell'autorimessione
(11.01.17)
Abstract
The article focuses on the
case, brought by many courts before the Italian Constitutional Court and
concerning the unconstitutionality of the so-called-Italicum electoral law. The
Author argues that the Constitutional Court could and should bring before itself
a case concerning those profiles the courts has not dealt with.
PIER LUIGI TOMAIUOLI
(05.01.17)
Abstract
The article focuses on the
impact of changes to the "living law" ("diritto vivente") on the process before the
Italian Constitutional Court, when such changes happen after a question of
unconstitutionality has already been raised before the Court.
Parte Seconda
LIBRI E RECENSIONI
FEDERICO SORRENTINO, Recensione
a Aa.Vv.,
La prova del NO. Il sistema politico italiano dopo il referendum
costituzionale, a cura di Andrea Pritoni, Marco Valbruzzi e Rinaldo Vignati. Rubettino
ed. Soveria Mannelli, 2016, pp. 198; ISBN: 9788849850611
(30.03.17)
Abstract
This
contribution reviews the volume titled
"La prova del NO. Il sistema politico italiano dopo il referendum
costituzionale" (Andrea Pritoni, Marco Valbruzzi and Rinaldo Vignati eds.).
The book gather
analysis and research carried out by several Italian scholars and dealing with
the referendum of 4 December 2016 and its interpretation.
Consulta OnLine (periodico online) ISSN 1971-9892