Consulta OnLine (periodico online) ISSN 1971-9892
2016/II
maggio-agosto
PASQUALE COSTANZO
La Svezia moderna a metà strada e l'istituzione del
bicameralismo
(22.06.2016)
Abstract
Modern Sweden halfway and the
establishment of bicameralism
The paper takes its cue
from the 150th anniversary of the Swedish Constitution, noting confirmations
and progress with respect to the previous constitutional regime
PASQUALE COSTANZO
La nascita dell'Argentina moderna
(09.07.2016)
Abstract
The paper recalls the birth
of modern Argentina following the declaration of independence of 8 July 1816,
emphasizing the events that have distinguished it
PARTE PRIMA
STUDI
CARLO PADULA
La Corte Edu e i giudici comuni nella
prospettiva della recente giurisprudenza costituzionale
(23.08.16)
Abstract
The paper examines the
effects deriving from the judgments of the ECtHR on national courts, in the
light of the most recent jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court.
BRUNO BRANCATI
(01.08.16)
Abstract
The paper concerns the
decision no. 84/2016 of the Italian Constitutional Court, which regards the
prohibition of scientific research on embryos. The Court has to face an ethical
dilemma, about which there are conflicting ideas. In this case, the Court takes
a neutral approach, but it is unsuitable for the Italian Constitution.
GIUSI SORRENTI
(25.07.16)
Abstract
The judgment of the
Constitutional Court n. 111/2016 represents a revirment with respect to the
previous constitutional jurisprudence on the obligation of the true
interpretation, since with it would seem that the judge "a quo",
although the obligation to try to prevent the antinomy is always imposed,
should no longer "prefer" the true interpretation. So the paper aims
to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this new hermeneutic approach,
within what appears to be a tendency, more generally, to centralize the
judgment by the constitutional judge, with the recovery of the foundations of
modern constitutionalism.
GIACOMO CANALE
(18.07.16)
Abstract
The paper reconstructs the
issue of the so-called "Unpacking" of the referendum question which
experienced a recent moment of renewed scientific and public debate in the
occasion of the confirmatory referendum for the so-called constitutional reform
project "Renzi-Boschi", with the analysis of a stimulating comparison
between the two main opposite doctrinal orientations.
GIORGIO GRASSO
Agenzie di
rating e impatto sulla sovranità
(12.07.16)
Abstract
This short article examines
the sovereign credit ratings that is the credit rating released from credit
rating Agencies where the entity rated or where the issuer of the debt or
financial obli-gation is a State or a regional or local authority of a State or
an international organization created by the State. During the financial and
economic crisis sovereign credit ratings both in Europe and in Latin America
shows deficiencies and some concerns for a lot of basic categories of
constitution-al law, because for example the publication of sovereign ratings
or outlooks and the disclosure of rating
changes affects the reliability of States, without any accountability of rating
Agencies, evenif the ratings have proven often to be inaccurate. By using
the provisions of the Article
5 of Regulation
(EU) No 1060/2009,
on the equivalence and certification based on
equivalence, between credit rating Agencies, registered in the European Union
and credit rating Agencies established in third countries, the article realized
a first compari-son with States like Argentina, Brazil and Mexico, with the aim
to prove that there cannot be power without
responsibility, and this
also concerns the
power of the
most powerful actors
in the age of
globalization, like credit rating Agencies.
ANTONIO RUGGERI
Cosa sono i
diritti fondamentali e da chi e come se ne può avere il riconoscimento e la
tutela
(30.06.16)
Abstract
The work discusses the
notion of "fundamental rights" within the Italian legal system,
taking into consideration the role of the "dialogue among courts" as
well. First of all, the Author focuses on definitions and on the very concept
of "fundamental" as regards rights. Second, issues arising from the
need to protect these rights are investigated. In this regard, specific
attention is devoted to the dialogue among courts, shedding light on the fact
that the (praiseworthy) attempt to "maximize" the protection of
rights might hide some risks for the certainty of law. As a conclusion, the
Author presents some considerations on the "work in progress" nature
of "enlarged" protection of rights, going beyond national
jurisdictions.
ANTONIO RUGGERI
(16.06.16)
Abstract
The present contribution
deals with civil partnerships and de facto relationships, which are regulated
by law no. 76/2016. The aim of this work is to discuss whether this law
complies with the Constitution and with the paradigm of "family"
which results from "living constitutional law", being the latter the
product of the Constitutional Court's case law as well as of ordinary courts'
decision and of praxis.
ANTONIO ARENA
(05.06.16)
Abstract
The article, after giving
account of the state of the art in the field of medically assisted procreation
of a heterologous type, takes stock of the main innovations introduced by Law
no. n. 76/2016 and on the innovative judgments of some judges of merit who have
attempted, in some cases with "creative" ideas, a "concrete"
definition of the interest of the minor, even beyond the normative data.
PASQUALE COSTANZO
Le
intercettazioni delle comunicazioni interpersonali (un vademecum
costituzionale)
(23.05.16)
Abstract
Interceptions of
interpersonal communications (a constitutional vademecum)
The work focuses on the
regulation of interceptions in the light of constitutional jurisprudence and
taking into account the new information technologies.
FRANCESCO MARONE
(23.05.16)
Abstract
With the decision of the
Constitutional Court n. 107 of 2015, the intervention of the regional councilor
who had demonstrated the existence of an "interest" in the cause was
admitted in the constitutional conflict by the State and the Regions. The
article, therefore, analyzes the possibility that said expanded constitutional
contradictory could "open the doors" to the admission of the
intervention of the parliamentarian in the conflict of attribution between
powers of the State pursuant to art. 68 of the Constitution.
Consulta OnLine (periodico online) ISSN 1971-9892