2016/III

settembre– dicembre

 

 

PARTE I

STUDI

 

 

SILVIA ROMBOLI

La nuova stagione dei controlimiti: il caso Taricco all’esame della Corte costituzionale

(23.12.16)

Abstract

The new season of the “controlimiti”: the Taricco case examined by the Constitutional Court

The application of the «controlimiti» by the judges (constitutional and non-constitutional) constitutes a clear brake on the transfer of sovereignty with respect to supranational law. The article analyses, first of all, some significant moments in which the Italian judges and some foreign judges decided to use this instrument or not. Subsequently, the paper reflects on the first effects of the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the «Taricco» case (8^th September 2015) in the Italian legal system (S.R.).

 

 

HENRI SCHMIT

Le prossime leggi elettorali

(12.12.16)

Abstract

The next electoral laws

The author reflects on the possible types of electoral regulations to be enacted in Italy after the Constitutional Court’s decision on the so-called Italicum electoral law, also in the light of the outcome of the constitutional referendum of 4 December 2016.

 

 

ANTONIO RUGGERI

Prime note per uno studio su crisi della sovranità e crisi della rappresentanza politica

(10.12.16)

Abstract

First comments with reference to the crisis of sovereignty and of political representation

The article includes some reflections on the crisis of sovereignty and political representation. After a brief analysis on the different ways to conceive “sovereignty” in the current days, the author focuses on the concept “representativeness” in a contest of “fragmented” sovereignty. In this regard, the final paragraph offers some preliminary answers in the light of the main Constitutional provisions.

 

 

MARTA MANGANARO

L’evoluzione del regionalismo differenziato alla luce delle riforme costituzionali. Alcune osservazioni sul punto, in comparazione con il modello territoriale vigente in Spagna

(05.12.16)

Abstract

The work presents an overview of the evolution of the differentiated Italian regionalism taking into account the constitutional revision of 2001 and the new model outlined by the Renzi-Boschi constitutional bill. The process is then compared with the one characterizing the autonomic system in Spain, in order to highlight the existing points of contact and differences.

 

 

UGO ADAMO

Alcune osservazioni critiche a proposito delle prospettive de jure condendo nella legislazione italiana in tema di ‘Direttive’ Anticipate di Trattamento

(28.11.16)

Abstract

Some critical remarks about the perspectives de jure condendo in the Italian legislation on the subject of «anticipated directives» for treatment

The aim of this article is to analyzes the various legislative proposals on living will currently under discussion in the Italian Parliament. In the first part, the author debate on the semantics of the expression ‘anticipate directive’; in the second, the work focus on the doctrinal elaborations about the end-of-life process and criticize the recent legislative proposals on this topic (U.A.)

 

 

GIORGIO GRASSO

Autonomia universitaria, senza responsabilità? Spunti dall’esperienza costituzionale italiana

(14.11.16)

Abstract

This article, discussed in an international congress at the University of Mendoza, in Argentina, in August 2016, examines the links between university autonomy, responsibility and the freedoms of teaching and research in the light of the provisions of the Italian Constitution and of the Law no. 240/2010 (G.G.).

 

 

ANTONIO RUGGERI

Il futuro dei diritti fondamentali e dell’Europa

(03.11.16)

Abstract

The paper focuses attention on fundamental rights and on the dialogue in that connection among the Courts, dwelling on divergences and convergences of the jurisprudential approaches of the European Courts and of the Italian Constitutional Court.

 

 

ANTONIO RUGGERI

Dignità dell’uomo, diritto alla riservatezza, strumenti di tutela (prime notazioni)

(21.10.16)

Abstract

The article examines the content and the limits of the right to privacy, paying special attention to the fields in which there are the greatest tensions between this right and other constitutionally protected legal positions.

 

 

ANTONIO RUGGERI

Giurisdizione e diritti: un rapporto complesso, ad oggi largamente inesplorato e bisognoso della sua opportuna chiarificazione

(05.10.16)

Abstract

The article analyses the relationship between jurisdiction and rights in the light of the decisional techniques, focusing above all on the importance of comparison and openness to international law in the solution of issues concerning fundamental rights. Particular attention is also paid to the question of loyal cooperation between the legislator and the judges in safeguarding fundamental rights.

 

 

PAOLO PASSAGLIA

Privacy e nuove tecnologie, un rapporto difficile. Il caso emblematico dei social media, tra regole generali e ricerca di una specificità a Corte Edu e i giudici comuni nella prospettiva della recente giurisprudenza costituzionale

(28.09.16)

Abstract

Privacy and new technologies, a difficult relationship. The emblematic case of social media, between general rules and the search for specificity in the Edu Court and the common judges in the perspective of the recent constitutional jurisprudence

New technologies have a deep impact on the right to privacy. The author analyzes the most relevant issues so as to show how the right to be let alone and the data protection can be endangered by new technologies, and the Internet in particular. The article then focuses on social media and criticizes, in this regard, some aspects of the new European regulation concerning data protection (P.P.)